Farmer distraught over fire that has burned his farm.

Farmer distraught over fire that has burned his farm. Source: Vecteezy.com

By Nnenia Campbell, Lori Peek, and Anna Canny

Disasters have long been characterized by the media, elected officials, and members of the public as “acts of nature” or “acts of God.” Such depictions are rooted in the idea that disasters are external to social systems, rather than a reflection of society itself.

More than 50 years of scholarship on social inequality in disaster has challenged this idea. A vast body of evidence underscores that disasters almost always lead to disproportionate harm and suffering among the most disadvantaged people in society. Low-income families, people of color, children, older adults, people with disabilities, and others with less power and fewer economic resources tend to be hurt first and worst when disaster strikes.

Research led by social scientists and interdisciplinary teams has clarified who is most at risk, where the most exposed and socially vulnerable populations live, why these groups may struggle to prepare for and respond to disaster, and how they are impacted in both the immediate and longer-term aftermath of environmental extremes.

The big question that remains is what can be done to address the inequities at the root of uneven exposure and the unequal effects of disaster?

This special collection of Research Counts provides groundbreaking insights from emerging leaders in the hazards and disaster field to help answer that pressing question.

About This Collection

This special collection on Equity and Inclusion in Disasters grew out of a shared commitment of the Natural Hazards Center and the Bill Anderson Fund to reduce disproportionate disaster harm. With the unwavering support of the Margaret A. Cargill Philanthropies, members of our respective organizations teamed up to publish this collection.

Our focus and choice of terminology were intentional. In emphasizing equity, we wanted to not only identify the uneven distribution of harm, but also promote fairer practices that can produce better, more just outcomes and conditions for all people. In highlighting inclusion, we started with an acknowledgement that there can be no justice unless we center the experiences of those who bear the greatest burdens of disaster, while embracing approaches that encourage deeper understanding and participation in disaster planning. Equity and inclusion go hand in hand, as the process of involving a spectrum of people in disaster research and its applications can lead to better outcomes across time, space, and hazard type.

The special collection features 24 original articles written by Bill Anderson Fund fellows, alums, and collaborators. The authors represent a diversity of perspectives and a wide range of disciplines. They bring approaches from the arts and humanities, social and physical sciences, engineering, public health, and beyond. They focus on a number of hazard types as well, including drought, floods, falling space debris, tsunamis, wildfires, extreme heat, winter storms, hurricanes, and compound hazards. What binds this body of work together is the commitment to identifying evidence-based, community-grounded, and equitable approaches to disaster risk reduction, response, and recovery.

The articles in this collection are organized around the following cross-cutting thematic areas:

  • Low-Attention Disasters
  • Social Marginalization and Inequality
  • Equity and Inclusion Throughout the Disaster Cycle
  • Best Practices for Community-Based Collaborations
  • Strengths and Capacities of Socially Marginalized Communities

Across these thematic areas, the authors offer fresh insights that can help inform more inclusive and effective policy and practice. For example, articles in this collection demonstrate how exclusionary policies and regulatory gaps are worsening the impacts of disaster—a situation that demands more robust disaster legal and financial aid. Other pieces illustrate how creative methodologies can uncover hidden risks and convey collective experiences of disaster injustice that powerfully communicate the need for systemic change. Several contributions speak to the urgent need to close gaps in data availability through using new tools and building broader coalitions of community partners.

Each article sheds light on a different, complex issue of inequality. Taken together, this special collection offers hope for a more compassionate, caring, and just future.